Talk:Unsupported titles/`period`

Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Talk:Unsupported titles/`period`. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Talk:Unsupported titles/`period`, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Talk:Unsupported titles/`period` in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Talk:Unsupported titles/`period` you have here. The definition of the word Talk:Unsupported titles/`period` will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofTalk:Unsupported titles/`period`, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.

RFD discussion: October 2016–June 2017

The following information has failed Wiktionary's deletion process (permalink).

It should not be re-entered without careful consideration.


  • rfd-sense: (programming, computing, networking)

This is in fact a heading for senses, the first of which is "Used as a space in e-mails." and example is "My email address is [email protected]"; for more of these senses, please see the entry.

My contention is that this is not "use" of the symbol to "convey meaning" in human language. In particular, my contention is that "point.x" in the C language to refer to member x of a structure is not a use for English Wiktionary's purpose.

A similar deletion rationale was used in a previous RFD now archived at Talk:Unsupported titles/Double period.

One way to phrase my deletion rationale is as a series of questions: Shall we include JOptionPane (Java), std::cin (C++), equ (Win Batch), foreach (Perl) as quasi-attested in source code? All keywords and all APIs in computing languages, quasi-attested in source code? --Dan Polansky (talk) 22:01, 8 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Keep and add more programming language symbols. --Daniel Carrero (talk) 04:11, 9 October 2016 (UTC)Reply
IMO, delete all of these, for the reasons already rehearsed for .. (double dot). The only one that gives me pause is the domain-name separator, and that's only because of all the entries we have like .com, .mil, .tk: I personally think that such entries should not include the dot, since it is indeed a separator. Equinox 09:07, 9 October 2016 (UTC)Reply
Surely if we're going to have a sense for 'used in e-mail addresses' then we need a corresponding sense at a, b, c, d and so on. Renard Migrant (talk) 17:28, 9 October 2016 (UTC)Reply
Do you mean creating a new sense at a defined as "a letter used in e-mail addresses"? No, a is just a letter. There is as much reason to create that sense and separate senses saying: "a letter used in some names of people", "a letter used in some flavors of ice cream", etc. I'd oppose any of that. --Daniel Carrero (talk) 17:55, 9 October 2016 (UTC)Reply
Oh, I see your point. Delete sense: "Used to separate words in e-mails." --Daniel Carrero (talk) 17:58, 9 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Sense of 'Used to separate words in e-mails' deleted; no consensus as to other senses. bd2412 T 20:06, 6 June 2017 (UTC)Reply